|
YuriPRIMEpoland (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I am glad that they balanced the classes out a bit, for sake of freedom you can take since that point. Like in AD&D and D&D 3.5 Wizard was so overpowered that for many of things he had to pay with his xp and shitload of gold. Like death of a familiar - you loose like 2k xp and can't summon him for year and one day... creating a wand or potion costs you ass-load of xp hence there was no point in doing alchemy or any real magic crafting. 4th ed lets you to explore bit more the areas left obscure
TheHuntress144 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
jon stewart?
arajuiojuo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I just played D&D 3.5 using World of Orfel setting ......... A W E S O M E
Uaxis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@paulnatcia I always thought it'd be cool if racial special abilities depended on your class.Like, ie., if your a halfling rogue your race ability is that you're better at picking locks. Or if you're a halfling barbarian you have the 'fuck yo' critical' ability.
Paragon468 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
My main problem with 4e is that characters can, quite literally, become amazingly godly. I really like playing 4e at lower levels, but 3.5 is awesome any time. I really wish a single goblin could hit me in 4e... Anything with the D20 system is pretty awesome though.
JacX1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
FUCK YO CRITICAL!
Gabrial13Cain (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Bipeedal? Come on Spoony.
DjFobse95 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
DOVAKIN!!!
WhyMeMoFo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Did he just say that the Warlord is the 'fluffer'??
WhyMeMoFo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@unowhatireallysaid CHEERS! 1st Edition then, 1st Edition now, 1st Edition forever! |